BANG

BANG
The theory of the evolution of the Coca Cola Can.

Billions of years ago, a big bang produced a large rock. As the rock cooled, sweet brown liquid formed on its surface. As time passed, aluminum formed itself into a can, a lid, and a tab. Millions of years later, red and white paint fell from the sky, and formed itself into the words "Coca Cola......12 Fluid Ounces"

Of course, my thoery is an insult to your intellect, because you know that if Coca Cola can is made, there must be a maker. If it is designd, there must be a desinger. The alternative, that it happened by chance or accident, is to movie into an intellectual free zone.

This is a qouted passage from The Way Of The Masters tract The Atheist Test. For cool and awesome TRACTS click here.

None

My Bio 2 teacher last year started our evolution notes off like this, "Some ppl say you can't believe in both God and evolution. That's not true. I believe in both." This threw me for a loop because the next words out of her mouth were that humans had evolved from hominid-like species, meaning animals similar to, but not the same as, apes or monkeys. Seems to me, but this is just my personal opinion, that if you truly believe in God you should also believe in what He says, right? So if God tells us explicitly that He, and He alone, created, who are we to argue? Point is, I don't see how someone can say that they beleive in both when they are so contradictory towards one another.

--------------------------------------------------------------
the end will justify the pain it took to get there

Darwin Believed In God

Charles Darwin said, "To suppose that the eye could have been formed by natural selection (meaning: evaluation)' seems I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree."

If man cannot begin to make a human eye, how could anyone in his or her right mind think that eyes formed by mere chance? In fact, man cannot make anything from nothing. We don't know how to do it. We can re-create, reform, develop....but we cannot create even one grain of sand from nothing. Yet, the eye is only a small part of the most sophisticated part of creation- the human body.

George Gallup, the famous statistician said,"I could prove God statistically; take the human body alone' the chance that all the functions of the individual would just happen, is statistical monstrosity."

Darwin is considered the founder of the theory of evalution (the thoery that man came from apes).

None

vannaleigh wrote: My Bio 2 teacher last year started our evolution notes off like this, "Some ppl say you can't believe in both God and evolution. That's not true. I believe in both." This threw me for a loop because the next words out of her mouth were that humans had evolved from hominid-like species, meaning animals similar to, but not the same as, apes or monkeys. Seems to me, but this is just my personal opinion, that if you truly believe in God you should also believe in what He says, right? So if God tells us explicitly that He, and He alone, created, who are we to argue? Point is, I don't see how someone can say that they beleive in both when they are so contradictory towards one another.

But when god created man he didnt just create hominid-like species, it was all human, it was adam, not adam the monkey boy if thats the point that u were trying to get across.

--------------------------------------------------------------
3 nails + 1 cross = 4 given!!